Inter-textual Creativity: Understanding Foucault, Heidegger, Nietzsche, later Wittgenstein

The general tenor {compositional density} of a general inter-faith postmodernism
Perry Anderson, Jean Baudrillard, Zygmunt Bauman, Steven Best, Judith Butler, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Derrida, Mike Featherstone, Michel Foucault, Francis Fukuyama, Felix Guattari, Donna J. Haraway, Sandra Harding, Nancy Harsock, David Harvey, Linda Hutcheon, Andreas Huyssen, Luce Irigaray, Frederic Jameson, Keith Jenkins, Douglass Kellner, Ernesto Laclau, Jean Francois Lyotard, Michel Maffesoli, Doreen Massey, Chantel Mouffe, Linda J. Nicholson, Friedrich Nietzsche, Richard Rorty, Steven Seidman, Hugh J. Gianni Vattimo, Robert Venturi, Wolfgang Welsch, Ludwig Wittgenstein (later Wittgenstein), Iris Marion Young, Slavoj Zizek.¹

Postmodernism through paradigm

highly influential [postmodernists] (established ‘classics’, ‘paradigm inventors’, and ‘game changers’) (e.g. Foucault, Heidegger, Nietzsche, later Wittgenstein;

very influential (very prominent contemporary scholars) (e.g. Anderson, Baudrillard, Bauman, Butler, Deleuze, Derrida, Fukuyama, Guattari, Jameson, Laclau, Latour, Lyotard, Meffesoli, Mouffe, Rorty, Zizek);

influential (prominent contemporary scholars) (e.g. Best, Featherstone, Haraway, Harding, Harstock, Harvey, Hassan, Heller, Hutcheon, Huyssen, Irigaray, Jenkins, Kellner, Lash, Lyon, Massey, Nicholson, Seidman, Silverman, Soja, Tester, Urry, Vattimo, Venturi, Welsch, Young).²

citation¹ – ² Introduction to The Postmodern Turn In The Social Sciences: Who are the postmodernists?

The Standard Biden 1 2

Sanders has just suffered an upset to his front-runner status. Right now it seems that Biden will be the nominee (3/4/2020).
It also seems that the corporate state has collectively coronated him.

So what is the status of the would be political revolution of the left (not violent revolution)? This remains to be known.

Terry Patten, an Integral luminary, has suggested that Biden will lead a seemingly insurgent round-about Tea Party Left movement.

While, on another front, the political commentator ThouArtThat0, a youtube Whiteheadian neurosophist, has indicated that the fight is still on, that Bernie can upend this re-insurrection fought so hard by an entitled corporate liberal establishment.

Independently, Eric Weinstein, within hours of victory, has compared this election to a grave and surreal pathological blackhole, gnawing for our attention, and yet with every interaction bringing closer to a decreased feeling of wholeness and yet a potentially deepening apathetic withdrawal.

What is transmodernism?

We can only survive if we enjoin each other as a whole. And postmodernism has failed to offer a valid set of anti-capitalist regimes. Therefore, we need a remodernism, or a new set of enlightenment techniques. If we are to survive as a species. In the long term. If we cannot transcend postmodern critique, or even get to that stage then our planet and the enlightenment project will be doomed. Transcend and include. Remodernism, Metamodernism, Performatism All ideas that oscillate between the “ideal human” and his enslavement to post-capitalist society We must even critique the critique. You know. In the long term we are looking fucked in terms of planetary survival. The only way to match our immense technology, is an equal development of wisdom. The co-development between art, self, and technology. As well as tech and self Cultural motif, culture genetics, culture theory Because if we can include the past, instead of always focusing on ourselves then we can heal our pathology We can heal capitalism We can defeat capitalism By intersecting the art discipline with the socio-scientific. That requires intellectual growth. As well as shadow work, to heal the traumas of our cultural identity. Because post-modernism teaches us that reality is a simulacrum, which means we are creating this pluriform cultural identity. But at the same time that requires moral strength, and a anti-nihilist life-passion (as nietzsche would say), which subsumes the further fracturing.

The Place of Dialogos (Propositional Metaphysics) In Core Zen Enlightenment

Those who detract from the esoteric core of the world’s religions, do so in the name of immanence (the platonic idea of being in the world of meaning).
The heart of the esoteric teachings are concerned with transcendence, the neoplatonic idea of unity, oneness.

It seems that between these two views, there comes the view of the Yogachara school of Tibetan Buddhism, which states that One and Many-ness are expressed in the mind of the participant, which is a beginingless continuum of clear light.

In Modern, and Postmodern times, we tend to focus on very abstract concepts, in isolation. This is the road of abstraction, which creates an isolating core of propositional metaphysics defined by anti-holism, unique in its core. Via particularization – as opposed to meaning – and also exclusion and imperialism, the domination of Truth (and abstract logos and dia logos) over the very real logic of harmonious non-partisan interaction that seems to have shaped the core beauty, and goodness of the Enlightenment (1700) tradition seems to have taken place.

Mandalic Reasoning on the Nature of The One Infinite Creator

Reasoning on the Nature of The One Infinite Creator: Erotic Emergence and Nondual Being

Transformative (idealist), Emergent (naturalist), and Aperspective (dialecticist)

Idealism is a primary intuition, and as such, its transformative potential informs, upregulates and downregulates and empowers formative actuality. Materialism is also a fact, which upregulates and, sub-articulates the meaning of LL and UL, with its transformative dialectic of emergentism. Technically Materialism is a tertiary intuition, so it is three points removed away from the circle. The third dialectic is called aperspectivism (LL), which creates the basis for energy as such to enter into any formative agreement within its own nature.

Each of these laws or distortions of the One Infinite Creator, or Godhead, suffers upon the perspectival weight of its own emergentism. The point within the triangle of becoming is the dialectical resolution point of the three faces of spirit (transformative, emergent, and aperspective), through which non-dual emergentism (as it were) takes place within the evolutive Erotic transcendelia of each Being in Time.

Divine Wholing™

We need a participatory commons of body/mind/spirit healing (ie wholing). The main agenda should not be the constant churning of meta-theoretical cognition which has seem to become the basis of most people’s theorizing (see Bawen and Post-Wilberians Theoretics). The participatory commons I’m speaking of is not a superficial supercomputer, network, “teal cognition”, or gnosis — in fact it’s the complete opposite. The participatory commons should not instruct cognitive participation, but it should reward cognitive embodiment, based and verified through the grammar of healing. A true Post-Integral participatory commons beyond simply mere meta-secularization, meta-modernism, or any such rarefied process. It will be the participation in a “Republic of the Heart” to take a quote from Terry Patton. Building the commons requires group participatory spiritual action, heretic-ally whole individuals, developmental ontologists, and those willing to do the spiritual work of ascension, and full yogic now-embodiment, in service of the Divine Life – the post-secularizing truth.